Below Exhibit B is Venter's affidavit known as the "False Formula" affidavit. No illegal drugs of any kind have ever been shown to have been anywhere near 54 Balfour Street. Only in the realm of speculation could wrong doing be alleged and Venter built upon his speculation by alluding to drug making formulas that are not true to science. Venter resorted to telling lies to make his speculative allegations appear to be real.

What also becomes known from studying the "False Formula" affidavit is that Venter submitted this document onto a platform outside of Prophet's criminal trial during the proceedings of Prophet's criminal trial which is a violation of Prophet's right to presumption of innocence.

Guilt cannot be presumed before the prosecution proves a charge beyond reasonable doubt, and this principle applies until the judgment is made final as defined in Article 266 of the MCCP.

There are a number of ways in which the presumption of innocence can be protected. First, according to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, the presumption is breached where public officials prejudge the outcome of a trial (General Comment no. 13, paragraph 7).

Public officials include judges, prosecutors, the police, including Casper Henderik Venter, and government officials, all of whom must avoid making public statements of the guilt of an individual prior to a conviction or after an acquittal.

So says International Law and Constitutional law dictates that Venter must save his criminal allegations against Prophet for the criminal trial and if during that trial, or anywhere else, Venter chooses to tell lies when testifying under oath and those lies can be demonstrated and exposed then Venter is in hot water.

Prophet has the right of presumption of innocence and Prophet also has the right to be protected from criminals who have commissioned the crime of perjury to ruin Prophet's life.