Below Annex VSA1 is the content of an affidavit that Prophet submitted into the Constitutional Court forfeiture trial but the court would not allow the affidavit which was to deny Prophet's right to challenge the lies of Casper Henderik Venter.

Annex VSA1 does not prove that Venter has committed perjury but it does raise doubt regarding Venter's claims.

Prophet is claiming that Venter committed perjury.

Venter has the right to presumption of innocence and he has the right to a fair trial but at the same time Prophet has the right to protect himself from liars and when some people refuse to see the facts for what they are and when those lies fall into the category of being criminal then Prophet is entitled to be protected by the law.

It is obviously noticeable that Michael Alan Smith does not agree with Venter's speculation.

Firstly, according to Smith, the combination of the two chemicals, 1-phenyl-2-propanone and methylamine does not produce methamphetamine in one step.

According to Venter to combine these chemicals would “exclude the possibility of any other substance but methamphetamine”.

Venter's speculation of possible outcomes is very different from Smith who informs us that the two chemicals can be combined to give the condensation product “1-phenyl-2-methyliminopropanone” and it is important to note Smith’s inclusion of “under appropriate conditions.”

Methanol would be required as a solvent which is an additional chemical and Venter avoids mentioning any of this because Venter doesn't have any methanol “found on the property” to tie into Venter's “400 to 600 grams” concoction.

In paragraph 6(2)(a) of Venter's “Impossible Volume Affidavit” he presents a formula where the two chemicals produce what Venter calls “N-formielmetamfetamine.”

So here we have Venter contradicting himself again in paragraph 8(5) of Venter's “False Formula Affidavit” with his “exclude the possibility of any other substance but methamphetamine.”

Contrary to Venter's claim, we have 3 possible substances.

According to Venter a combination of 1-phenyl-2-propanone and methylamine could result in either “N-formielmetamfetamine” or “methamphetamine.”

According to Smith from a combination of 1-phenyl-2-propanone and methylamine, the condensation product is “1-phenyl-2-methyliminopropanone.”

Onto this we must not forget to add Smith's inclusion of “if this is the intended product.”

It is clear from Smith's affidavit that methamphetamine is not the only possible outcome of the two start off chemicals which contradicts what Venter tells us with his “exclude the possibility of any other substance but methamphetamine”.

Smith then goes on to tell us that a number of chemicals would be required if the intention was to produce methamphetamine.

Another problem for Venter's lie regarding “from the chemicals found on the property” is that none of these additional essential chemicals listed by Smith in his affidavit were found on the property.

Another stumbling block for Venter is Smith's inclusion of “(and apparatus)”

Smith tells us that to go Venter's route of methamphetamine then the “reduction” needs to be done under pressures as high as “1200 atmospheres.”

Under these pressures glass would shatter violently and reinforced stainless steel chambers would become some of the essential “apparatus.”

The only “apparatus” that Venter says was “found on the property” was standard laboratory glass used for simple distillation of water, alcohol or perfume.

So again; Venter's speculation as to what I was supposed to have been doing fails yet again because even if I did have all the required chemicals which I did not have and if it had been my intention to do what Venter says I was going to do then not having reinforced stainless steel chambers with cone and threaded connections and not having all the essential “apparatus” which would have included a high pressure pump or generator/intensifier none of which was “found on the property” would have rendered my intentions impossible to manifest.

Venter has lied under oath and the National Director of Public Prosecutions has engaged fraud on the High Court.

The Erasmus judgement must be set aside because fraud on the court cannot be allowed to stand when it has been exposed.

Erasmus tells us in paragraph 30 of his judgement that methamphetamine “appears to be relatively easy to manufacture”; so bearing this in mind I asked Artificial Intelligence about some of the required apparatus that would have been needed to make methamphetamine when following Venter's speculation.

I posed the question to Artificial Intelligence and the answer that came back exposes how far off the mark Erasmus is with his “relatively easy” rubbish talk.

Artificial Intelligence is asked:

What apparatus is required to produce 1200 atmospheres of pressure inside laboratory glassware.

Artificial Intelligence answers with:

Producing 1200 atmospheres of pressure (approx. 1215 bar or 17,640 psi) in a laboratory requires a

specialized, engineered high-pressure system, not standard laboratory glassware, as typical lab glass can only withstand very low pressures (e.g., up to 45 psi for some glass pressure reactors). Such high pressures necessitate the use of heavy-duty metal components.

Required Apparatus.

The system required would include the following industrial and research-grade components:

• High-Pressure Vessel (Reactor): This is the core component that holds the sample or reaction. It must be constructed from highly reinforced materials such as stainless steel, titanium alloys, or nickel-based superalloys. The vessel is engineered with thick walls to safely contain the immense forces involved.

   

• Pressure Generator/Intensifier: A high-pressure pump or a pressure intensifier is used to generate the required pressure. These devices use principles like a large-area piston driving a smaller-area piston to multiply force and achieve ultra-high pressures. A hand-powered pump may be used for small volumes, or a motor-driven system for larger or continuous processes.

   

• High-Pressure Tubing and Fittings: Standard laboratory tubing cannot handle these pressures. Specialized, thick-walled stainless steel tubing and secure, robust fittings (e.g., coned-and-threaded connections) are essential for connecting the components.

   

• Pressure Monitoring System: The system requires a highly accurate pressure gauge or transducer rated for well over 1200 atm (e.g., a Bourdon-type gauge or an electrical transducer).

   

• Safety Systems: Given the extreme pressures, safety is paramount. The apparatus must be equipped with multiple safety features:

   

  • Pressure Relief Valve (PRV): An automatic mechanism to release excess pressure if a set limit is exceeded.

     

  • Burst Disc: A single-use fail-safe that ruptures at a predetermined pressure, offering secondary protection against over-pressurization.

     

  • Safety Interlocks: Mechanisms to prevent operation if the vessel is not sealed correctly.

The Role of Glassware

It is critical to understand that standard laboratory glassware will shatter violently at pressures far below 1200 atmospheres, posing an extreme safety hazard. The snippets indicate that the term "1200 atmospheres" in some contexts refers to model numbers of standard equipment (like a glove box or viscometer), not an operating pressure.

For experiments requiring visibility or specific chemical resistance, a small glass cell made of specialized materials like sapphire or strain-free optical glass may be used, but this is housed inside a robust metal pressure vessel and is designed as a small "window" or sample holder, not the primary pressure boundary.

In summary, the apparatus is a sophisticated, heavy-duty metal pressure system designed and tested by specialized manufacturers. All operations must adhere strictly to manufacturer guidelines and safety protocols to prevent catastrophic failure.