Below Annex E1 is a copy of an affidavit compiled by Johan Smit, the person who arrested Prophet on drug charges, wherein paragraph 4 of his affidavit, Smit identifies B&M Scientific as being "die invoerder" which translates to "the importer."

This document was presented to Judge Erasmus.

Why did Judge Erasmus not give fair consideration to Smit's allegations? Why did Judge Erasmus not say that B&M Scientific was guilty of importing a drug? Why did Judge Erasmus not condemn B&M Scientific and proceed to forfeit the properties of B&M Scientific?

Let's phrase the question differently. Did B&M Scientific import a drug?

It can reasonably be concluded that B&M Scientific did not "import" a drug.

The question then that must be asked is how is it in any way even vaguely reasonable or in any way, shape or size justifiable that Judge Erasmus can, without suggestion or evidence, falsely accuse, unfairly convict and then go so far as to criminally punish Simon Prophet for having been the guilty party to have "imported" this "supposed to be" "drug"?

The Erasmus Judgement stands before the world as a miscarriage of justice.

Prophet has never been convicted on any drug related charge and on top of that, according to the South African Police, Prophet has no criminal record.

How is it possible that Judge Erasmus has punished Prophet in the most terrible way for being a drug dealing criminal?