Above is what happened to Alex Jones when, on his social media platform, he accused some people of being "crisis actors" and those people took him to court and accused Alex Jones of telling lies about who those people were and those people sued Alex Jones and Alex Jones has been ordered to pay out somewhere around R20 000 000 000.

So bearing in mind all of the above let's contemplate another scenario where, it has not been social gossip, but it has been Perjury with a capital "P" that has played a crucial role in presenting Simon Prophet to the world as a "drug dealing criminal" and both Simon Prophet's dignity and his life have been destroyed beyond repair?

Below Annex E6 is an extract from the Cape Argus newspaper report about Judge Thring's decision to not proceed with an order to forfeit 54 Balfour Street.

"What will happen if he is Acquitted?

So, what happens when, on face value, there is a strong case that the National Director of Public Prosecutions' star and only witness against Prophet has lied about Prophet, and the National Director of Public Prosecutions has used those same lies against Prophet, who is a suspect and is also an accused, and on account of those lies he, Prophet, gets to be punished before he, Prophet, is acquitted?

What happens when the judge also tells lies about the suspect, Prophet, and then punishes the suspect, Prophet, on the grounds of a suspicion while the suspect, Prophet, is also an accused awaiting trial?

What happens when it can be shown that the National Director of Public Prosecutions, in order to get a confession from Prophet or to get information from Prophet, has tortured Prophet who is both the suspect and the accused?

In Prophet's forfeiture trials the National Director of Public Prosecutions was quick to quote and expound on American court cases.

Now it's Prophet's turn to quote and expound on American court cases like, for example, the Alex Jones defamation trial.

Just something to think about. For those of you who have lied about me.