Below Annex ES1 is a copy of a page taken from Prophet's replying affidavit to the Supreme Court of Appeal where in the last paragraph on the page Prophet explains how he has been forced to sell his property to meet the mounting financial burdens of defending his properties and his dignity.

Only one of two things can be deduced from this; either the Constitutional Court did not read this paragraph or they ignored it.

The forfeiture of 54 Balfour did leave Prophet homeless which conflicts with the right for everyone to have adequate housing; see Section 26 of the Constitution.

At the end of September 2007, with the last of winter's snow on the mountain, Prophet was kicked out into the street with just the clothes on his back and nowhere to go.

The forfeiture of 54 Balfour Street ignored Section 25 of the Constitution to deprive Prophet of his home but it also deprived Prophet of his second hand business which Prophet operated from the ground floor garage on the property.

To deprive Prophet of his business is in conflict with Article 6 of the International
Covenant of Economic and Cultural Rights in that Prophet has the fundamental right to gain his living by work and it is actually the duty of the state to protect such rights rather than participating in the theft of Prophet's business thereby denying him his right to so work.

Not satisfied with all of the above, at the forced eviction of Prophet from his property, the National Director of Public Prosecutions, deprived Prophet of all his personal possessions including his two cars, one of which was for sale in Prophet's second hand business and all of the stock of the business was also taken by the National Director of Public Prosecutions leaving Prophet with nothing.

While all this was taking place, through an order of the court made by Judge Desai in 2001, Prophet was also being made to pay to the bank, the mortgage bond on the same property and he was forced to continue paying this even after he had been evicted from the property.

At the eviction, the National Director of Public Prosecutions connived with and coerced the Woodstock Police to falsely accuse Prophet of being in possession of an illegal firearm and ammunition. Prophet was arrested and he was incarcerated until, eventually, the police were forced to admit that Prophet was the registered owner of the gun.

The same gun is still registered to Prophet.