Below Annex ES2 is a copy of an extract of Simon Prophet's replying affidavit to the Supreme Court of Appeal which is evidence that both the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court should have been aware of the lies put forward by Judge Erasmus.

Paragraph 13 below is as clear as a bell.

Paragraph 13 only focuses on the "importing" lie presented by Judge Erasmus and it should have set off a loud warning siren for the Judges but when it's not convenient for people to look at something then often they turn the other way.

Since when can a judge make up his own fabricated lies to punish an innocent man?