On a balance of probabilities and a reasonable suspicion you can prove anything.
|
|
Lying goes hand in hand with stealing. Simon Prophet has laid criminal charges of perjury against Casper Hendrik Venter who is the only supposed to be witness of the National Director of Public Prosecution. Under scrutiny it can be shown that Casper Hendrik Venter was playing in the dark and no other person contributed anything of note against Simon Prophet in the civil trial. Many people submitted affidavits and had things to say but those submissions relied entirely on Venter's submissions or centred around things that had little or nothing to do with Simon Prophet. Casper Venter submitted, according to Simon Prophet, his two fraudulent affidavits into Simon Prophet's civil trial outside of the criminal trials during the proceedings of the criminal trials and by falsely proclaiming that Simon Prophet was a criminal in those affidavits, Venter, was violating Simon Prophet's right to presumption of innocence as scrutiny of the law books will confirm and so a criminal trial against Venter will be kicking off with confirmed unlawful activity on Venter's part. Add onto that the lies about Simon Prophet that Venter has included in Venter's thesis that was submitted to the University of South Africa 2020 and it is not looking good for Venter. A guilty verdict against Venter will be disastrous for the National Director of Public Prosecutions because, Venter, as the only supposed to be witness against Simon Prophet in the civil forfeiture trials, will be eliminated and it will follow that the Constitutional Court will be called upon to set aside the judgement against Simon Prophet and we know where that will take us having looked at what happened to Alex Jones. The South African Police, the Senior Public Prosecutor of the Cape Town Magistrate's Court, the South African Human Rights Commission and the Judicial Service Commission all have copies of Simon Prophet's complaints against Venter where Venter's lies have been exposed and even before any conviction is legally confirmed, it is our opinion, that anyone, who applies their mind, can only agree that the allegations are compelling so let there be no excuse here to pretend ignorance of the facts as they are. All of these documents are published on this website for anyone to read so everything is out in the open which leaves no room for anyone to plead ignorance about what is going on here. In the second criminal trial, Cape Town Magistrate's Court case number 16/236/03, it was shown to be a fact that the drug police found nothing illegal at 54 Balfour Street during their unlawful search and the arresting officer admitted under cross examination that finding any of the chemicals that were unlawfully seized by the drug police could not warrant an arrest under any section of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act of 1992. After this trial and after Simon Prophet had received an unconditional acquittal on all of the criminal charges that had been brought against him, Simon Prophet, relying on Section 31(1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, approached the arresting officer with a request for the return of all of Simon Prophet's articles that had been seized by the police but the drug police refused to comply with the law and in a follow up trial, Simon Prophet in desperation, applied to the Cape Town Magistrate's Court to force the return of his chemicals and his laboratory equipment. Under oath, the drug police claimed that these things had been destroyed leaving Magistrate Eric Louw in a quandary of not being able to order the return of something that does not exist but Magistrate Eric Louw did say that nothing would stand in the way for Simon Prophet to sue the police for compensation. In the civil trial, Cape Town High Court case number 5926/01, that preceded these findings of Magistrate Le Roux in the second criminal trial and before the Judgement of Magistrate Eric Louw, Erasmus condemned Simon Prophet using Venter's fictitious and erroneous speculative stories that were elaborated upon by others. Venter never appeared in person before Erasmus and Venter never faced cross examination in court. A list of names has been compiled of people of whom it is suspected have engaged unlawfully against Simon Prophet and who have deliberately engaged unlawfully to conceal and defend criminal acts and this list is available. To see the list of names CLICK HERE and scroll down to paragraph 137 in the file that has been submitted to the International Criminal Court on the 4th of September 2024.
|